The FTC’s complaint in this case should be informative for any company offering trials of goods or services. According to the FTC’s complaint, the companies sued offered what they called “risk-free trials” of teeth whitening products. They advertised and sold these products not through “front-end” web pages but through “back-end” sites, meaning that the pages were not accessible through public web search access or published URLs. Consumers were directed to the landing page from another website, often as a “reward” for completing a survey. To accept this trial plan, the consumer scrolled down and clicked on a “Complete Checkout” button. In some instances, though, the FTC alleged, the site directed the consumer to a very similar looking page, with another “Complete Checkout” button. The consumer then waited to receive their sample product in the mail, but according to the FTC, the trial product often did not arrive until after the 8-day cancellation period had elapsed. Furthermore, when it arrived, the package allegedly contained not only the trial product but the regular monthly product. The FTC said that even if the consumer did act to cancel the product within 8 days-even before receiving the sample product-that the consumer had to return the first month’s product in order to receive a refund.

FTC sues AT&T over ‘deceptive’ mobile data throttling (update: response)

We may be compensated if you make a purchase via a link on this site. The following discussion addresses this issue, with tips on how to handle the situation. Is he responsible for the bills while we’re separated? What am I obligated to pay if I move out?

Jan 09,  · The FTC previously sued site operator Craig Brittain for allegedly duping women into sending nude videos, which he posted online. He then allegedly demanded between $ and $ to remove the images.

Email If you have one of the more than million numbers on the national Do Not Call Registry, chances are good that you’re still getting annoying sales pitches or recorded calls offering lower interest rates, a “free” trip or some other special offer. Unfortunately, those are not the calls that the Do Not Call list was designed to stop. The registry provides legitimate telemarketers with phone numbers that can’t be used for sales pitches.

More likely is the calls you’re still getting peppered with are scams. To that end, here are five tips from the Federal Trade Commission , which operates the registry and tries to stop the rogue callers, about dealing with those unwelcome interruptions. If you get an unwanted call, don’t engage the caller, don’t press any buttons even if they promise to remove you from their list. If the calls are coming from the same number, you might be able to use a service from your phone provider to block the calls check if there’s a charge first.

A variety of other options exist that could also help, such as smartphone apps that block calls and services like NoMoRobo. If you get an unwanted sales call or robocall, even if what’s being dangled before you sounds really enticing, it’s most likely a scam.

Apple sues Qualcomm in Beijing seeking 1 billion yuan

There was just one problem: Paulson has been charged with violating state and federal laws, one of more than actions announced today as part of a sweeping crackdown on fraudulent veterans charities by the Federal Trade Commission FTC and law enforcement officials and charity regulators from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The massive joint federal-state effort, focusing on multiple cases of sham charities that bilked consumers out of millions of dollars in donations, also includes a new nationwide initiative to educate consumers about how to donate wisely.

Among the names he used were: Peterson allegedly made millions of robocalls asking people for donations he falsely claimed were tax deductible.

Oct 30,  · The Federal Trade Commission is dipping its toe into the online dating pool—but only to sue an English company for creating phony profiles to lure users into paying more.

IRS , currently before the D. Circuit, EPIC argued that the IRS has the authority to disclose the returns to correct numerous misstatements of fact concerning his financial ties to Russia. President Trump tweeted that “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. In a second case, EPIC v. Two-thirds of voters favor the release of Trump’s tax returns. The investigation “uncovered a disturbing disregard for voters’ personal privacy” and found that the Leave. EU campaign and Cambridge Analytica both improperly harvested personal data.

The Commissioner’s office will fine the Leave. EU campaign and would fine Cambridge Analytica if the firm were not already in bankruptcy proceedings. The UK report proposes a code of practice for the use of personal data in political campaigns. In March, the FTC said it would investigate the matter , but there is still no report, no findings and no fine. According to reports , children are kept in detention centers for extended periods due to this policy which places sponsors and household members at risk of deportation.

Ashley Madison dating site to pay $1.6 mn over breach (Update)

For Release June 20, The Federal Trade Commission has brought suit against a fraudulent Internet operation posing as a legitimate multi-level marketing business. The FTC charges that the scheme is actually an illegal pyramid that uses phony promises of easy income to scam consumers from across the country. According to the FTC complaint, since the operators of the scam have used Web sites, radio, direct mail and print advertisements to promote “Streamline,” a fraudulent business opportunity whose members purportedly distribute a line of dietary supplements and health-care products.

Marketing materials contain claims such as:

Oct 30,  · According to the FTC’s complaint, these messages were almost always bogus. The only way users could respond to that email was to sign-up for a paid membership of $10 to $30 a month.

She ruled that the sites’ owner, Lead Wey also known as Brandon Wade , alleged enough facts to warrant further proceedings. The ruling, issued late last month, rejected PayPal’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit at a preliminary stage. PayPal allegedly told Wey that it had banned his sites because they violated the acceptable use policy, which prohibits the sale of “certain sexually oriented materials or services.

Wey says in court papers that WhatsYourPrice and his other dating sites don’t allow nudity, obscenity or prostitution ads. Wey alleges that PayPal’s reasons for terminating his accounts were pretextual, arguing that the company continues to process payments to other dating sites that potentially violate its terms of service. The complaint against PayPal also included an allegation that the site violated antitrust law.

But Illston ruled in PayPal’s favor on that count. She found that Wey didn’t sufficiently allege either that PayPal participates in the online dating market, much less that it is attempting to monopolize it.

Healthy Living Health Center

What was the Ashley Madison business? Ashley Madison advertised itself as a site to find someone interested in having a discrete extramarital affair. Members paid through credit card. Though based in Toronto, it operated in 46 countries around the world. Since Ashley Madison has had about 19 million U. Ashley Madison had information on some 36 million people, including 19 million people in the U.

Jan 13,  · “The FTC complaint alleges certain security hacking concerns for consumer routers and IP cameras, and we firmly believe that charges alleged in the .

March 3, March 4, Watts Feed the Children is facing new turmoil — an official inquiry into complaints made about its operations by its former CEO and president, J. Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater confirmed he will act as a special prosecutor and determine whether there is any wrongdoing at the Oklahoma City-based charity.

It has been beset by a series of controversies dating back to when it forced out its founder, evangelist Larry Jones. The official inquiry was initiated last fall by the state attorney general’s office. The AG’s office on Wednesday asked Prater for assistance in reviewing evidence and reaching an appropriate resolution.

Prater said he will meet with the AG’s office next week.

The FTC is investigating Ashley Madison following last year’s hack

For starters, the data dump includes the usernames, first and last names, and hashed passwords for 33 million Ashley Madison accounts. On top of that, the dump includes 36 million email addresses more than 15, of which are US government email addresses , and partial credit card data, partial addresses, transaction data, and phone numbers for a significant percentage of users. It gets even worse, too.

The profile data for pretty much every user is available in the dump, which means anyone can look through a find a user’s sexual desires such as “threesomes” , and their relationship statuses.

Mar 23,  · The FTC continues to take action against companies and telemarketers that ignore the Registry. The latest example: today the FTC announced a complaint against Alliance Security, a home security system installation company, Alliance’s owner, Jasjit Gotra, and two of Alliance’s telemarketing firms, along with their owners.

A malfunctioning appliance can turn your home upside down, and worse, cause more damage than some dirty dishes. So, we trust that when we call a business calling itself “A Plus Appliance Repair” or “Rescue Appliance,” that we’ll get a competent repair person who can fix what’s wrong. But that’s not what was happening in Cincinnati, according to a lawsuit filed by the Ohio Attorney General.

The suit claims Terry Haynes was taking payment from prospective customers, then never delivering on the repairs. You Lost Your Credit Card! When that happens, no doubt you immediately have a rush of adrenalin, feeling financially exposed. Hopefully you just left it at home when you used it to pay for something online at your desk. Or maybe you left it in your blue jeans pocket with your driver’s license from the night before.

The answer may surprise you. However, these hacks have become so commonplace that most consumers have already purchased this service, as a prophylactic measure, since identity theft can be so financially damaging. In addition to applying for these services, what rights do consumer’s have when their data is illegally mined?

Online dating service admits to fake profiles

Paez While cybersecurity and data protection laws continue to develop in the United States and around the world, they trail behind more rapid advancements in industrial internet of things “IoT” , cognitive and other artificial intelligence, cloud 2. He assists companies with U. In addition, Mauricio has significant experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy legal issues related to new product development and business initiatives, such as connected and driverless vehicles, smart cities, smart-grid, industrial internet applications and services, “big data” applications and analytics, machine learning and data rights, medical devices, and consumer IoT products.

The revised draft pushes back the effective dates and compliance deadlines, adds limited exemptions, narrows the requirement to notify the DFS of cybersecurity events, adds flexibility to the program’s requirements, and narrows certain definitions, among other changes. The press release notes that the Attorney General’s office is communicating with the company regarding the circumstances of the breach and disclosure to law enforcement.

These priorities represent practices, products, and services that the OCIE perceives to present potential heightened risks to investors or the markets.

Ftc sues online dating site over fake flirty profiles. Published: The fake profiles and messages caused many users to upgrade to paid subscriptions. Budweiser Goes The Cool And Funny Route On Microbrewery’s ‘Dilly Dilly’ Craft IPA 5.

Order the Book Today Victim Restitution for Financial and Emotional Suffering from Fraud The principle of restitution is an integral part of virtually every formal system of criminal justice. It holds that, whatever else society does to punish its wrongdoers, it should also insure that the criminal is required, if possible, to restorethe victim to his or her prior state of well-being. The payment of restitution by perpetrators can mark the end of a financial nightmare for fraud victims.

It not only serves to right a wrong, it often allows them to return to whatever level of financial security they enjoyed before the crime. The biggest dream for those who have suffered from financial crime is getting some money back, preferably from the people who stole it from them. However, in reality, very few fraud perpetrators actually pay restitution. Many perpetrators will have spent the money and have no discernible resources with which to repay victims.

The Regulatory Reach of the FTC, and its International Implications